It's working but it's really slow when working with logfiles on 150mb.Īnyone have any ideas on how to optimize it? $PACKET_TYPES = "Access-Request" Ģ5 = "Alternate-Resource-Reclaim-Request"
Where it becomes challenging is to actually monitor / analyse the accounting files and then adjust domain settings to have a sensible configuration to allow to backoff quick enough and still have high throughput.Īnyone with a valid license can access the domain configurations and performance tips via the Port25 forum ( ) or have Port25 assist with certain performance issues.Im testing PowerShell out to parse some NPS log files with PowerShell. It is very easy to setup acct-file, pattern-lists, smtp-pattern-list, domains, sources, vmta pools etc. I seriously doubt that it is possible to have a boiler-plate Pmta configuration. While tools like OP's are valuable to those people, I seriously question that some lack the basic skill set to manage a Linux server and tools like this are more a danger as it now even more removes competence from people who already have very basic knowledge of how their infrastructure works. The one part I do not get (this is based on the number of queries I receive about my Github PMTA bouncehandler) is that there are many users of Port25 out there who manage an really expensive mail infrastructure but somehow have not bothered to even read the PowerMTA userguide in it's entirety. I just thought the above needed a comment. I have no intention to interfere with your sales thread.
Well, it's a free market so it's up to everyone to decide for themselves whether to buy this SW or not and again, time will tell. I know I do, I currently have six extended licenses and one regular for development. I guess all of us has been spoiled by the MW price and yet I wonder how many who really pays for the proper license. One thing is definitely certain and that is that the value for Mailwizz by far exceeds its price.
On top of this, creating software that requires someone else's software (like building plugins for MW) also means that you can never have more customers than for the original software, pretty obvious, but making a comparison between the pricing of the original software and the software that builds on top of it, can never be a "fair" comparison. One thing that non-developers never seem to realize is that it's not just the time it took to develop something that makes up the price, but also the ideas, uniqueness, preparations, value-for-money, market value and so on.